NAT-315: Restore ISIS should be optional in migrate iptrunk

requested review from @neda.moeini

assigned to @jorge.sasiain

added 3 commits

• 4b99b21c...1295b282 - 2 commits from branch develop
• 85bf7928 - NAT-315: Restore ISIS should be optional in migrate iptrunk

Compare with previous version

requested review from @simone.spinelli and removed review request for @neda.moeini

@simone.spinelli Could you please take a look at this MR and merge it if it's okay with you?

@jorge.sasiain Could you fix the conflict then we can merge this MR?

requested review from @neda.moeini and removed review request for @simone.spinelli

added 19 commits

• 85bf7928...6b89b478 - 9 earlier commits
• 1a8ed1f3 - add docstrings to the tasks
• dea39e96 - add docstrings to router workflows
• b984f3bc - add docstrings to the rest of the
• 40ba3cdb - resolve more linting errors
• 877af3cb - resolve linting errors in netboxcli
• 7db4c25c - finishing touches
• 77b366b2 - resolve last linting errors
• 1f0416e6 - resolve documentation linting errors
• 0cb0114b - undo auto-formatting Alembic generated files
• 083e1fec - NAT-315: rebase with develop

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 8950f88b - NAT-315: fix duplicate line

Compare with previous version

@neda.moeini Should be ready now!

@jorge.sasiain You need to rebase locally.

I swear I somehow saw that there were no conflicts anymore... I guess I did something wrong when rebasing. Let me address this.

@jorge.sasiain No problem. I'll merge it to develop after your rebase.

I'm not allowed to unprotect this branch so I can't force push. I'll close this MR and open a new one. Sorry for the inconvenience!

closed