Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
compendium-v2
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
geant-swd
compendium-v2
Commits
4639b876
Commit
4639b876
authored
1 year ago
by
Bjarke Madsen
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
fix text issue in migration
parent
ce681c96
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
compendium_v2/migrations/versions/b3e1c5149181_insert_survey_model_2022.py
+9
-9
9 additions, 9 deletions
...rations/versions/b3e1c5149181_insert_survey_model_2022.py
with
9 additions
and
9 deletions
compendium_v2/migrations/versions/b3e1c5149181_insert_survey_model_2022.py
+
9
−
9
View file @
4639b876
...
...
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ new_survey_model = """
"
name
"
:
"
ec_project_names
"
,
"
visibleIf
"
:
"
{ec_projects} =
'
Yes
'"
,
"
indent
"
: 1,
"
title
"
:
"
Please list the name of the projects
\n
"
,
"
title
"
:
"
Please list the name of the projects
"
,
"
description
"
:
"
Use one line per project.
"
,
"
columns
"
: [
{
...
...
@@ -1374,19 +1374,19 @@ new_survey_model = """
"
choices
"
: [
{
"
value
"
:
"
higher_than_r_e_charges
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
Charges typically higher than for R
+
E users
"
"
text
"
:
"
Charges typically higher than for R
&
E users
"
},
{
"
value
"
:
"
same_as_r_e_charges
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
Same charging model as for R
+
E users
"
"
text
"
:
"
Same charging model as for R
&
E users
"
},
{
"
value
"
:
"
no_charges_if_r_e_requested
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
No charges applied if requested by R
+
E users
"
"
text
"
:
"
No charges applied if requested by R
&
E users
"
},
{
"
value
"
:
"
lower_than_r_e_charges
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
Charges typically lower than for R
+
E users
"
"
text
"
:
"
Charges typically lower than for R
&
E users
"
}
]
}
...
...
@@ -1394,11 +1394,11 @@ new_survey_model = """
"
rows
"
: [
{
"
value
"
:
"
collaboration
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
Connection to your network for collaboration with R
+
E users
"
"
text
"
:
"
Connection to your network for collaboration with R
&
E users
"
},
{
"
value
"
:
"
services
"
,
"
text
"
:
"
Connection to your network for supplying services for R
+
E
"
"
text
"
:
"
Connection to your network for supplying services for R
&
E
"
},
{
"
value
"
:
"
peering
"
,
...
...
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ new_survey_model = """
{
"
type
"
:
"
multipletext
"
,
"
name
"
:
"
commodity_vs_r_e
"
,
"
title
"
:
"
What is the ratio of commodity vs R
+
E traffic in your network?
"
,
"
title
"
:
"
What is the ratio of commodity vs R
&
E traffic in your network?
"
,
"
validators
"
: [
{
"
type
"
:
"
expression
"
,
...
...
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ new_survey_model = """
"
items
"
: [
{
"
name
"
:
"
r_e
"
,
"
title
"
:
"
R
+
E percentage
"
,
"
title
"
:
"
R
&
E percentage
"
,
"
validators
"
: [
{
"
type
"
:
"
numeric
"
,
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment